May 13, 2021
The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, in accordance with the Procedure for Public Consultations on the Formation and Implementation of State Policy, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated November 03, 2010 No. 996, conducted electronic consultations with the public on the draft order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine “On Approval of Amendments to the Procedure Monitoring of information on the results of mandatory technical control transmitted by the subjects of mandatory technical control to nationwide database” (hereinafter referred to as the draft order), which was published on March 24, 2021 in the subheading “Draft regulations” of the heading “Normative base of the Ministry of Internal Affairs” of the official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine: here.
Information on proposals received during electronic consultations with the public on the draft order and on the results of their consideration is given in the table.
No. of sales/n |
Offer Information |
Author of the proposal |
Offer Consideration Information |
1. |
The draft amendments provide for amendments to paragraph 16 of subsection 1 of paragraph 7 of the Procedure for monitoring information on the results of mandatory technical control transmitted by the subjects of mandatory technical control to the national database (hereinafter referred to as the Monitoring Procedure), by replacing the words “than the odometer indicator, fixed” in words “or equal to the odometer index fixed”. Therefore, if during the OTC of the vehicle a slight discrepancy is found with the drafting of the act of non-conformity, then after eliminating the minor discrepancy and re-passing the OTC — this OTC protocol can be recognized as “invalid” due to the fact that the odometer indicator is equal to the indicator recorded during the previous passage of the OTC K. Offer not to make such changes. |
Chairman of the public union “Subjects of testing vehicles for serviceability” Chernenko I. IN. |
Rejected The draft order provides |
2. |
It is proposed in paragraph 2 of the Procedure for conducting monitoring the words “during the monitoring by the authorized person of the center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs monitoring of information on the results of mandatory technical control, to be replaced by the words “during the monitoring by the authorized person of the center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the monitoring of the results of mandatory technical control (protocol for checking the technical condition of the vehicle or act of non-compliance technical condition of the vehicle, as well as materials of photo-fixation (photos) and video fixation (video recording, stopshots, screenshots) of the mandatory process technical control of the vehicle), that”, as well as to make changes relating to the register of results of mandatory technical inspection of vehicles, in paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and supplement with a new paragraph 5 1. |
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. The amount of information transmitted by the subjects of mandatory technical control of vehicles to the national database is determined by acts of higher legal force, namely the Procedure for the formation of a nationwide database and the OTC Procedure.
|
3. |
Not only OTC protocols (positive result) should be subject to cancellation, but also non-compliance acts, since the subject of OTC may incorrectly classify a dangerous discrepancy as, for example, minor or significant, and the difference between these statuses is gigantic. |
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. The procedure for
|
4. |
The wording “the color of the light exposure of outdoor lighting devices does not meet the requirements established by law” is vague, allows arbitrary interpretation and will lead to additional abuse in the OTC. In addition, in this position it is not specified which external lighting devices are in question (fog, low beam, high beam, etc.).
|
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. |
5. |
Employees of the RSC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs may abuse the definition of “layering of dirt”, considering as a layer of dirt even the thinnest, but visually noticeable layer of dust or earth, even if this is not a problem for conducting OTC. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify that in the case when the layer of dirt does not prevent the brake system from being checked, this should not be considered a violation. |
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. The
|
6. |
The deletion of subsection 14 is not considered appropriate. We offer to return. |
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. |
7. |
The “coordinates” of the norm in paragraph 9 are incorrectly defined.
|
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. |
8. |
Replacing the “conclusion on the results of monitoring the results of the OTC results and the recognition of the OTC protocol as invalid” with the “conclusion on the recognition of the protocol of checking the technical condition of the vehicle as invalid”, together with the removal of monitoring as a source of information on the existence of grounds for canceling the OTC protocol, is an illegal step. This change can be used as a hidden legalization of roadside inspection of vehicles for their serviceability. This approach is not compatible with the current transport and road laws, since the basic law on the reform of the OTC has not been adopted at the moment and the scope of roadside inspection remains unregulated at the legislative level. Therefore, until the adoption of the relevant legislative changes, it is necessary to leave Appendix No. 1 to the Monitoring Procedure in the current version. |
Project Manager of the Government-Public Initiative “Together Against Corruption” Serebryakov M. M. |
Rejected. |
As a result of electronic consultations with the public on the draft order, it was decided to reject the comments and suggestions sent by the public.
Acting Head of the |
|